JAY KESAN CASES

Jay Kesan has served as a technical expert in patent litigations in the areas of wireless technology and systems, communication systems, electronic commerce applications, smartphone technologies, software and microelectronics

Jay Kesan is a practicing patent attorney for over 20 years. He has served as counsel in many patent lawsuits, in federal district court, at the Federal Circuit and at the Patent Trials and Appeals Board (PTAB). He has argued several cases before the PTAB and the Federal Circuit.

He has been actively involved in virtually every aspect of patent litigation as counsel, technical expert, legal expert, Special Master, mediator, and appellate counsel.

LIST OF JAY KESAN CASES

    • Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing L P v. Xerox Global Services Inc., U.S.D.C. for the
      Central District of California, 2:07-cv-04958-RGK-FFM, filing date: Jul. 31, 2007 (expert for
      Xerox; testified by deposition).
    • EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Verizon Clinton Center Drive Corp., et al., Civil Action No.
      6:08-cv-00385, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, filing date: Sept. 28,
      2008 (expert for Eon; testified by deposition).
    • NTech Industries, Inc. v. Holland Scientific, Inc., U.S.D.C. for the District of Arizona, 2:08-cv00475-SRB, filing date: Mar. 11, 2008 (expert for Holland Scientific; submitted expert report).
    • EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Sensus USA, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-116,
      U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, filing date: Mar. 13, 2009 (expert for
      Eon; testified by deposition).
    • Every Penny Counts (EPC) v. Bank of America, Inc., et al., U.S.D.C. for the Middle District of
      Florida, 2:07-CV-42-FTM-99SPC, filing date: Jan. 25, 2007 (expert for EPC; testified by
      deposition).
    • Crown Iron Works Company, et al. v. Specialty Protein Producers, Inc., et al., State of
      Minnesota, District Court, Ramsey County, Second Judicial District, 62-CV-07-3700, filing date:
      Oct. 17, 2007 (expert for SPP; testified by deposition).
    • EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Sensus USA, Inc., et al, Civil Action No. 3:12-01011 MEJ,
      U.S.D.C. for Northern District of California, filing date: Oct. 22, 2010 (expert for Eon, submitted
      expert report).
    • EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Cantaloupe Systems, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:11-cv00015, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, filing date: Jan. 7, 2011
      (expert for Eon; testified by deposition).
    • GBS Laboratories, LLC v. Pyntikov and Shevchenko, Patent Arbitration, Farifax County,
      Virginia (expert for Pyntikov and Shevchenko; testified at arbitration).
    • EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. AT&T Mobility, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-1555-
      SCC, U.S.D.C. for the District of Puerto Rico, filing date: Jun. 14, 2011 (expert for Eon).
    • EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Landis+Gyr Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-317-LEDJDL, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, filing date: Jun. 17, 2011 (expert
      for Eon; testified by deposition; testified at trial).
    • EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Skyguard, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00015-LEDJDL, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, filing date: Jun. 17, 2011 (expert
      for Eon; testified by deposition).
    • South Dakota Board of Regents (SDBOR) v. Council on Higher Education (COHE), State Unfair
      Labor Practice (ULP) Hearing (expert for COHE; testified at hearing).
    • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Research In Motion Corporation, Civil
      Action No. 3:12-cv-01652, U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, filing
      date: May 29, 2012 (expert for MTel; testified by deposition).
    • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. United Parcel Service, Inc., Civil Action No.
      1:12-cv-03222-AT, U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, filing date:
      Sept. 14, 2012 (expert for MTel; testified by deposition).
    • EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Apple Inc., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-05511-WHO, U.S.D.C.
      for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, filing date: Dec. 19, 2012 (expert
      for Eon).
    • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies LLC vs. Research in Motion Corporation; Civil
      Action No. 3:12-cv-01652-JRG-RSP; U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas
      Division, filing date: May 29, 2012 (expert for MTel; testified by deposition).
    • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al., Civil Action No.
      2:13-cv-00886, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filing date: Oct.
      20, 2013 (expert for MTel; testified by deposition).
    • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies LLC vs. HTC America, Inc.; Civil Action No. 2:13-
      cv-00948-JRG-RSP; U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filing date:
      Nov. 7, 2013 (expert for MTel, testified by deposition and at trial).
    • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc.,
      Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-00947, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division,
      filing date: Nov. 7, 2013 (expert for MTel; testified by deposition).
    • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., Civil Action No. 2:13-
      cv-00883, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filing date: Oct. 29,
      2013 (expert for MTel; testified by deposition).
    • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Leap Wireless International, Inc., et al., Civil
      Action No. 2:13-cv-00885, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filing
      date: Oct. 30, 2013 (expert for MTel; testified by deposition).
    • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al., Civil Action
      No. 2:14-cv-00897, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filing date:
      Sept. 15, 2014 (expert for MTel; testified by deposition).
    • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Sprint Nextel Corporation, Civil Action No.
      2:12-cv-832-JRG-RSP, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filing date:
      Dec. 31, 2012 (expert for MTel; testified by deposition).
    • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 2:13-cv-258, U.S.D.C.
      for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filing date: Apr. 2, 2013 (expert for MTel;
      testified by deposition and at trial).
    • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Telecommunications America,
      LLC, Case No. 2:13-cv-259, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filing
      date: Apr. 2, 2013 (expert for MTel; testified by deposition and at trial).
    • A. Katrinecz et al. v. Motorola Mobility, LLC, Civil Action No. 1:12-CV-00235-LY, U.S.D.C.
      for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division (expert for Katrinecz; testified by deposition).
    • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al., Civil
      Action No. 2:15-cv-00183, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filing
      date: Feb. 9, 2015 (expert for MTel; testified by deposition).
    • Michael C. Ryan and Ryan Data Exchange, Ltd. d/b/a Rydex, Ltd. v. Simmons Perrine Moyer
      Bergman, PLC, Law No. LACL 130898, Iowa District Court for Polk County (expert for SPMB,
      PLC).
    • Sonos Inc. v. D&M Holdings Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01330-RGA, U.S.D.C. for the
      District of Delaware, filing date: Oct. 21, 2014 (expert for D&M Holdings; testified at trial).
    • Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. AT&T, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-0576-
      RWS-RSP, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filing date: April 30,
      2015 (expert for CCE).
    • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Google, Inc., Civil Action No. 2:16-cv00002-JRG-RSP, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, filing date: Jan.4, 2016 (expert for MTel).
    • Customedia Technologies, LLC v. DISH Network Corporation and DISH Network, L.L.C.; Civil
      Action No. 2:16-cv-00129-JRG, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division,
      filing date: Feb. 10, 2016 (expert for Customedia Technologies)
    • D&M Holdings, Inc., et al. v. Sonos, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00141-RGA, U.S.D.C. for
      the District of Delaware, filing date: Mar. 7, 2016 (expert for D&M Holdings).
    • Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. HTC Corp., et al., C.A. No. 6:16-cv-00475,
      U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, filing date: May 31, 2016 (expert for
      CCE).
    • Dish Network LLC v. Customedia Technologies, LLC, PTAB, CBM2017-00032; IPR2017-
      00724; IPR 2017-00717; CBM2017-00023; IPR2017-00454; CBM2017-00019; IPR2017-00936;
      CBM2017-00031; IPR2017-00638; IPR2017-00639
    • Harmonix Music Systems, Inc. v. Princeton Digital Image Corp., PTAB, IPR-00155
    • Rubicon Communications, LP v. Lego A/S, PTAB, IPR2016-01187
    • Apple v. Cellular Communications Equipment, LLC, PTAB, IPR2016-01493; IPR2016-01480;
      IPR2016-01500
    • HTC v. Cellular Communications Equipment, LLC, PTAB, IPR2016-01501; IPR2016-01503
    • Mobile Synergy Solutions, LLC v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al., CIV. A. No.6:17-cv-309-JRGKNM, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, filing date: May 18, 2017
      (expert for MSS).
    • Sonos, Inc. v. D&M Holdings, Inc., PTAB, IPR2017-01045
    • AData Technology (U.S.A.) Co., Ltd. & AData Technology Co., Ltd. v. Si-Flash Drives, LLC,
      PTAB, IPR2018-00194 and IPR2018-00194
    • HTC Corp. and HTC America, Inc. vs. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson and Ericsson, Case No.
      6:18-cv-00243-JRG, U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (expert for
      Ericsson).
    • Management Analytics, Inc. Quine Intellectual Property Law Group, Case No. RG18900956, Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, filing date: April 16, 2018 (expert for
      Management Analytics).
    • Celltrace Comms. Ltd. v. Acacia Research Corp. et al., ICC Action No. 22402/RD-101022-0125, International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Arbitration, Feb. 2019 (expert for Acacia).